Researchers at ICAP’s Harlem Prevention Center joined the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) today to announce study results that showed disturbing rates of new HIV infections occurring among black gay and bisexual men in the U.S. (also known as men who have sex with men, or MSM), particularly among those age 30 and younger.

Duy Linh Tu, an assistant professor at Columbia Journalism School, has been teaching students digital storytelling techniques since 2002. So he was encouraging when a former student told him she wanted to make a documentary about the impact of HIV in the Deep South—and intrigued when she suggested he work on it with her.

Seven Columbia alumni, two current students and two coaches will represent the United States, Croatia, Dominica and Egypt in the 2012 Olympic Games in London, which begin July 27. This international group of Lions is made up of five fencers and a coach, two runners, two rowers and a field hockey player—all seeking Olympic glory. American fencers Nzingha Prescod (CC’15), Nicole Ross (CC’12), James Williams (CC’07, GSAS’09) and Jeff Spear (CC’10) secured their places in the games during the Division I National Championships in Virginia Beach, Va. in April. Prescod, the only current Columbia student, was named the Ivy League’s first Women’s Fencing Rookie of the Year in 2011 and took home gold at the Junior Women’s Foil World Championships in Jordan the same year. She also was featured in \"Essence\" magazine’s “Wealth and Power List” last October. The sophomore took off the last academic year to train for the Olympics; she plans to major in economics when she returns to Columbia in September. Ross, who recently graduated with an art history degree, was the 2010 NCAA champion in women’s foil and made first team All-American three years in a row. The Manhattan native holds a collection of gold and bronze medals from the Pan American Games in 2011 and 2009, and was twice named Columbia’s student athlete of the month. On the men’s side, Williams is a member of the 2008 United States’ silver medal-winning team in Beijing, and has medalled in the Pan American Games, won the National Championships in 2012 and was ranked as high as 18th in the world. (He is now 32nd in the world and third in the U.S.) A two-time team captain while at Columbia, Williams was twice named to second team NCAA All-American, won the Ivy League Championships three times and was named to the Academic All-Ivy Team twice. He holds a bachelor’s in history and Russian studies and a master’s in Slavic cultures. With a name suited for swordplay, Spear is a three-time All-American fencer who was named first team All-Ivy League three times. The evolutionary biology major received the 2010 NCAA Elite 88 award for fencing, which is presented to the student athlete with the highest cumulative G.P.A.—in his case, 4.07. The 2008 NCAA champion was also the 2010 ESPN The Magazine Academic All-American of the Year. Sherif Farrag (CC’09) won a spot on Egypt’s national fencing team and will compete in the men’s foil in London. A two-time team captain at Columbia, he was twice named first team All-Ivy League and competed twice at the NCAA Championships. Michael Aufrichtig, Columbia’s head fencing coach for the last year, will coach the fencing portion of the men’s modern pentathlon, which also includes horseback riding, swimming, rifle and running. Under Aufrichtig, who previously chaired the New York Athletic Club Fencing Program, the Lion men had their best finish at the Ivy League Championships in four years, and the women finished just one win away from taking home the league title. Lisa Stublic (CC’06), a music theory major and for four years a star distance runner on Columbia’s championship-winning cross-country team, is Croatia’s first female Olympic marathon runner. Stublic qualified for London by running Berlin’s marathon in 2:33.42, finishing ninth. Last year, she broke Croatia’s marathon record, running 2:30.46 in Linz, Austria. Stublic also holds records for Croatia in the 3,000-meter steeplechase, the 500-meter and the half marathon. A Connecticut native, Stublic has trained in Croatia, her father’s homeland, since 2007. Erison Hurtault (CC’07), a sprinter who ran qualifying heats in the Beijing Olympics in 2008 but did not advance to the finals, will once again represent Dominica, his parents’ native country, in the men’s 400-meter. The economics major won the 400-meter in the Ivy League championship all four years he ran track at Columbia and repeatedly broke his own school record in the event. He ran his personal best—45.40—in Sacramento in 2007. The same year, Hurtault, an All-American and seven-time Ivy League Heptagonal Champion in the 400-meter, was honored with Connie S. Maniatty Outstanding Senior Athlete Award, the Athletics Department’s highest award for Columbia student-athletes. Nick LaCava (CC’09) will row the lightweight men’s four without coxswain for the United States in London. His boat finished first in the 2012 Final Olympic Qualification Regatta in Lucerne, Switzerland in May. LaCava, who majored in economics here and has since co-founded a chocolate company called Chocomize, won the lightweight pair at the 2012 National Selection Regatta #1. Caryn Davies (LAW’13), a veteran of the U.S. national rowing team that captured a gold medal at the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing and a silver medal in Athens in 2004, will once again represent the United States in the women’s eight. Davies, who enrolled in Columbia Law School three years ago, postponed her studies to train and qualify for the London games. Earlier this year, she set a world record in the eight at the 2012 Samsung World Rowing Cup II. Caroline Nichols, a new assistant field hockey coach at Columbia, will compete as a member of the U.S. women’s field hockey team in London. As a defender on the U.S. National Team, Nichols was a member of the 2008 Beijing Olympics team and on the U.S. team that defeated top ranked Argentina to win gold at the 2011 Pan American Games. In 2006, she was named to the USA World Cup Training Squad and was a member of the Netherlands Tour team in 2007. In addition, alumnus David Barry (CC, '87) looks to help the U.S. win gold at the 2012 Olympic Games in London as the the Greco-Roman Team Leader for USA Wrestling. Barry, who was recently named USA Wrestling’s Myron Roderick Man of the Year, has served as the Greco-Roman Team Leader since 2009. During his Columbia wrestling career, Barry was a first-team All-Ivy League selection as a sophomore, a two-time EIWA placewinner and a team captain as a senior. —by Meghan Berry

Editor’s Note: The above video interview took place in July 2012, immediately following news of the election and the ongoing issues surrounding violence and journalists in Mexico. When Pablo Piccato was a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Texas at Austin, a professor suggested he look at crime and public health in Mexico City in the early 20th century for his dissertation. Piccato’s dissertation was the basis of his first book, City of Suspects: Crime in Mexico City, 1900-1931, later followed by The Tyranny of Opinion: Honor in the Construction of the Mexican Public Sphere. His third book will focus on “the cultural and political constructions of crime” in 20th-century Mexico. As drug cartels become increasingly dominant—and violent—in Mexico, his area of expertise has yet to fall out of vogue. “I had hoped that this theme of crime would go away,” he said. Piccato directs Columbia’s Institute of Latin American Studies as well as the master of arts program in Latin American and Caribbean studies. This year the institute celebrates its 50th anniversary, which he plans to mark with a panel discussion about Frank Tannenbaum, a prominent historian and criminologist who taught Latin American history at Columbia for 30 years and founded University Seminars, and other events on the relevance of Latin American studies today. Piccato noted with satisfaction that the institute brings together students and faculty from across Columbia in many different disciplines. “It’s been great to create real connections between the institute and the rest of the University,” he said. Q. How did you, an Argentinian, end up studying Mexico? I was born there, but at the time of the military coup in 1976, I moved to Mexico with my family. I was 12 then and went on to high school in Mexico and did my B.A. in Mexico’s National University. I decided to study Mexico’s history because I wanted to understand the country, and from there the Ph.D. seemed a natural step. Q. Your recent book, The Tyranny of Opinion, examines the role of honor in Mexico’s political history. Can you explain? Honor is very ingrained in the way Mexican people think about themselves in politics and business. The word itself is not used that much anymore, but people care deeply about reputation. The book looks at a moment when honor was so central in Mexican politics that duels and libel suits were a common aspect of everyday life. Q. How has crime in Mexico changed over the last century? Crime has been decreasing in Mexico since the early 1900s. Obviously, there was a revolution in 1910, but in general murder rates were very high in the first quarter of the 20th century. Rates decreased until the 1990s, and now they’re going up again. Many factors explain this, but you need to put it in historical context. Violence is not just something that is endemic. That tends to be the image of Mexico—this violent country where people are carrying guns all the time and killing each other. That’s not the reality. Q. How did Mexico become a major player in the world’s drug trade? The drug trade really took off in the 1970s—first marijuana, then heroin, cocaine and most recently methamphetamines. In the 1980s, a lot of the cocaine going into the U.S. went through the Caribbean. But when that route was shut down, cocaine began to come through Mexico. That gave the Mexican organizations an increasingly important role in the trafficking of cocaine, the most profitable of drugs. As these cartels became more wealthy and powerful, they had the ability to corrupt the police, but they were not necessarily violent. The widespread violence is relatively new. In the last six to 10 years, cartel leaders have been arrested, which created splits within organizations. At the same time, new routes and new products, like methamphetamines, formed. The business became more disorganized and competitive. That’s what has created violence. Q. How often are these perpetrators of violence arrested and punished? What is happening today has a lot to do with long-term problems within the police and justice system, which is weak, slow and lacks transparency. Mexican people do not have any faith in it. If you look at the numbers, a very small percentage of homicides lead to a guilty sentence. Most are not even investigated or lead to an indictment. Basically, you can get away with murder. The priority for the police is drug enforcement. When there’s a murder, and there’s evidence that that murder is related to drugs, the murder investigation is subordinated to the prosecution against the big drug lords. This has led to a very low number of solved crimes. Q. What has Mexico’s government done to combat drugs and violence? Mexico’s president, Felipe Calderón, sent the army into the streets to go after the drug organizations. Some big bosses were captured with support from U.S. intelligence, but just sending the army out there doesn’t solve anything. Calderón’s strategy has not been successful. It’s actually increased violence. The army will patrol a city, capture a few people and things will quiet down. But when the army leaves, things usually get worse. It’s not a law enforcement institution; it is not intended to investigate crimes and often operates without clear legal parameters. The human rights abuses linked to this violence are a critical issue in Mexico right now. The number of complaints against the army of torture, disappearance and other abuses is growing every year, but not enough of those complaints are investigated. As a result, the image of the army has deteriorated. They are seen in some regions as the ones who commit violence and enjoy impunity. Q. What role has the U.S. played in fighting crime in Mexico? Secretary (Hillary) Clinton and other officials in the U.S. talk about human rights in Mexico and working to improve the justice system. But the bulk of U.S. money goes directly into law enforcement—and what is happening in law enforcement, as I’ve said, is not positive from the point of view of the rights of the Mexican population. The priority for the U.S. continues to be interdiction and arrest operations. American policies don’t seem to demonstrate a serious commitment to peace in Mexico. Q. Mexico is the U.S.’s third-largest trading partner, with about $1 billion worth of goods traveling between the countries each day. Can this partnership strengthen Mexico’s economy? Trade has increased between the two countries since NAFTA was enacted in 1994, but this has not benefited all sectors of the Mexican economy to the same extent. Assembly plants along the northern border export to the U.S., but their workers do not always have unions and endure difficult working conditions. The integration of the two economies is not an integration of labor, so that means that the inequality of per capita income continues to be very high—about 3-1—between two countries that share one of the longest borders in the world. Q. What are the respective positions of the two countries on immigration? Right now, migration to the U.S. is very low because people in Mexico know that there is a job shortage in America. If Mexicans hear from relatives or friends in the U.S. that people in certain industries are needed, that’s when they’ll go. The immigration issue has not progressed under the Obama administration the way people expected. Part of that is because this Congress doesn’t favor immigration reform. But the number of people deported to Mexico has increased during this administration even though there’s evidence that immigration doesn’t affect unemployment rates. The people who are out of jobs in the U.S. are not the people who would do the jobs that the immigrants do. One troubling aspect of the situation is the political rhetoric—we’re hearing about 11 million undocumented aliens who are targeted by some politicians as subjects who should remain in the shadows and who should not be able to claim any of the same legal rights as the rest of the U.S. population. The situation of migrants in Mexico, mostly from Central America, is not much better, although recently there have been important reforms to immigration laws. Q. As many as 60 journalists have been killed in Mexico in the last 10 years. Who is committing these crimes, and what has this done to the state of the press there? If you look at the press today in Mexico, compared to 20 years ago, there’s a world of difference. It has become stronger and more important in the last decades. From 1929 up until 2000, the same party held the presidency, and the relationship between the government and the big newspapers was completely intertwined—business interests and personal connections didn’t encourage free journalism. Now we have an open and critical press in Mexico City and other cities. The problem arises when you go to the places that have been affected by drug violence. That’s where large numbers of journalists are being threatened and assassinated. It’s one of the worst countries in the world on that front. Most of the journalists who are victimized cover the police beat and local corruption. They are the ones who have to report where bodies are found. The drug organizations are very conscious of their public image, so they threaten journalists to present a picture that will be favorable to them or negative to their adversaries. What’s really impressive is that journalists know about these dangers, but they still report. That tells you how healthy and strong public opinion can be in Mexico. People want this information, and the journalists fulfill their obligation. Q. Can you critique U.S. media coverage of Latin America? There’s always a story about how dangerous Mexico is around spring break. But U.S. college kids continue to go to Mexico and nothing happens. If you consider the millions of Americans who visit Mexico and the number of them who are victims of serious crime, it’s still very safe there. But if anything happens, it is presented in the media as just one more example of how crazy things are across the border. It’s very problematic coverage. Look at the main newspapers. It is not easy to find something on Mexico in The New York Times that is not about drugs and violence.

Provost John Coatsworth has appointed Sree Sreenivasan as Columbia’s first Chief Digital Officer. 

Deputy Mayor Robert K. Steel and Small Business Services Commissioner Robert Walsh presented La-Verna Fountain, Columbia’s vice president for Construction Business Services and Communications, with the Minority and Women-owned Business Enterprise Advocate of the Year Award for Upper Manhattan.

When word came that Katharina Pistor, Columbia Law School’s Michael I. Sovern Professor of Law, had been chosen to receive the Max Planck Research Award for 2012, the comparative law expert was in a hotel room in Florence, Italy, preparing for a student’s dissertation defense. Pistor, to be sure, was not expecting the news she received when the Max Planck Society’s president, Peter Gruss, interrupted her background reading with a call. “I picked up the phone, and he said: ‘I have good news. You were just awarded the Max Planck Research Prize and 750,000 euros,’” Pistor says, recalling the moment when she realized she would formally join the ranks of some of the world’s most noted academics. After the immediate shock subsided, Pistor (below) made a small request to Gruss. “You have to give me a break right now,” she said, “I need a moment to digest this.” Considering the stature of the honor, Pistor’s reaction to the news seems like an entirely reasonable response. But taking into account that this year’s criteria for the award—which is presented to two academic professionals in the natural and engineering sciences, the life sciences, and the humanities on an annually alternating basis—was “Regulations of International Financial Markets,” the selection of Pistor is far from a surprise. During the past 10 years, Pistor has solidified her position as one of the world’s preeminent authorities on the interplay between law, sovereign states, and the global financial system. In 2010, she established Columbia Law School’s Center on Global Legal Transformation, a multi-disciplinary venue to re-conceptualize existing theories of law and governance. “We need a new way of thinking about these issues because the current way doesn’t lead to any solutions,” she says, referring to the impetus for the center. “I am not suggesting that I have found the silver bullet that will fix everything, but I want to look at global finance through the lens of law.” As a Max Planck Research Prize recipient, Pistor can use the award money during the next five years to fund new and innovative research. She said she plans to partner with various colleagues in Germany, New York, and Oxford, but also with those in emerging markets, such as Brazil and India. Specifically, Pistor wants to “scale up” two facets of her work that are already underway at the Center on Global Legal Transformation—analyzing the impact of financial regulatory efforts undertaken by various nations on the global financial system and probing the limitations of emergent global property rights regimes. The Max Planck Research Prize is awarded jointly by Germany’s most prestigious research organizations, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Max Planck Society. The latter encompasses various institutes and is named after the German scientist who discovered quantum physics. The society operates a number of research hubs in Germany and abroad, in places like Rome and Florence. Only current or former university presidents can submit nominees for the Max Planck Research Prize, which is awarded each year to one German-based and one internationally-based academic. The economist and director of the Max Planck Institute for Collective Goods, Martin Hellwig, joins Pistor as a 2012 recipient. As explained on the Max Planck website, this year’s award seeks to “support scientific collaboration between national and international economies in this area and to develop sustainable overall solutions.” That is no small task considering the severity of economic problems most western economies are currently facing. “If you want to find a solution, you have to cut the interdependent financial system back to a national size,” Pistor says. “But if we want to keep these international borders open, we have a much more complex system to manage.” To improve the current situation, Pistor adds that she “wants to identify the most vulnerable points in the system and show: ‘Here is where new instabilities are building and where we have to monitor, if not intervene, to prevent another crash.’ We have to be much more on our toes.” It is not without a bit of irony that Pistor is now being awarded a prize that bears the name Max Planck. In 1998, she worked at the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Private Law in Hamburg. She recalls at the time having to navigate what would prove to be a key crossroads in her career. After a year in Hamburg, she accepted a job at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government before accepting a faculty position at Columbia Law School in 2001. She credits the United States’ academic system for affording her the flexibility to pursue her wide-ranging interests. “Had I stayed in Germany,” she says, “I could not have done the work that prepared me for this award.” Pistor does not expect the award to affect her course load in the fall, or to have a dramatic logistical impact on her teaching. She does, however, foresee spending a bit more time in her native Germany over the next several years to facilitate an even closer examination of the complex problems facing European economic integration. On that of-the-moment topic, Pistor treads carefully, but holds firm to a basic principle. \"If you want countries to resolve crises at the national level, then they need to be able to control capital inflows, but that is not consistent with a single currency,” she says. “Still, I am a bit skeptical about whether the centralization of financial governance is the right strategy for Europe. I don’t think it is a great idea to put more straight jackets around democratically elected governments or to presume that there is a one-size-fits-all model.” # # # Columbia Law School, founded in 1858, stands at the forefront of legal education and of the law in a global society. Columbia Law School combines traditional strengths in corporate law and financial regulation, international and comparative law, property, contracts, constitutional law, and administrative law with pioneering work in intellectual property, digital technology, tax law and policy, national security, human rights, sexuality and gender, and environmental law.

Some 75 Columbia faculty members, post-docs, students and friends gathered in Low Library at 3 a.m. Wednesday to experience one of the biggest developments in particle physics, watching a live feed from Geneva where news was announced of the discovery of a new sub-atomic particle—quite possibly the long-elusive Higgs boson. 

Columbia mourns the passing of three members of its community who made significant contributions to the University. 

Robert Shapiro is a professor of political science, who specializes in American politics, especially public opinion and political behavior, political psychology and political leadership.

Here’s his view on the issues raised in the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 opinion on the Affordable Care Act.

The Inamori Foundation announced that Professor Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak has been selected to receive the 28th annual Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy in the field of thought and ethics. An Indian intellectual, activist and University Professor, Spivak is also a founder of the Institute for Comparative Literature and Society. Known as the “Nobel of the arts,” the Kyoto Prize is an international award presented annually to individuals who have contributed significantly to the scientific, cultural and spiritual betterment of mankind in categories of advanced technology, basic sciences and arts and philosophy. An author of numerous books and publications, Spivak is best known for her introduction to the translation of Jacques Derrida's Of Grammatology (1976) and her 1988 essay “Can the Subaltern Speak,” where she spotlights those who are economically dispossessed, forcibly marginalized and rendered without agency by their social status. Her other published works include Myself Must I Remake (1974), In Other Worlds (1987), The Post-Colonial Critic (1988), Outside in the Teaching Machine (1993), Imaginary Maps (1994), Breast Stories (1997), A Critique of Postcolonial Reason (1999), Old Women (1999), Song for Kali (2000), Chotti Munda and His Arrow (2002), Death of a Discipline (2003), What is Gender (2006), Who Sings the Nation-State (2007), Other Asias (2008), Nationalism and the Imagination (2010), and the forthcoming An Aesthetic Education (Harvard University Press). Asked about her goals, Spivak remains committed to fulfilling “a profound and ethical responsibility to humanities’ role in creating a will for social justice among minorities who have been deprived of language and history through an invisible structure of oppression—as well as students at the top who are digitalized too soon.” Spivak joins Dr. Ivan Sutherland (Advanced Technology), a computer scientist known as the father of computer graphics, and molecular biologist Dr. Yoshinori Ohsumi (Basic Sciences) as this year’s honorees of the Kyoto Prize. The laureates receive a diploma, a 20-karat gold Kyoto Prize medal and a cash gift of $630,000 in recognition of lifelong contributions to society at a ceremony in Kyoto, Japan on November 10, 2012. The non-profit Inamori Foundation was established in 1984 by Dr. Kazuo Inamori, founder and chairman emeritus of Kyocera Corporation, founder of and honorary adviser to KDDI Corporation, and director and chairman emeritus of Japan Airlines. The Foundation created the Kyoto Prize in 1985, in line with Dr. Inamori’s belief that a human being has no higher calling than to strive for the greater good of society, and that the future of humanity can be assured only when there is a balance between our scientific progress and our spiritual depth. With the 2012 laureates, the prize has honored 90 individuals and one foundation—collectively representing 15 nations. Individual laureates range from scientists, engineers and researchers to philosophers, painters, architects, sculptors, musicians and film directors. The United States has produced the most recipients (36), followed by Japan (16), the United Kingdom (12), and France (8). More information can be found at —by Cindy del Rosario-Tapan

As the eyes of the world focused on Egypt’s transition to democracy, Columbia University political science faculty members conducted a quantitative research workshop for aspiring social scientists at The American University in Cairo just weeks before Egypt’s historic presidential elections.

One in eight people who suffer a heart attack or other acute coronary event experience clinically significant symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), according to a meta-analysis of 24 studies led by Columbia University Medical Center researchers. 

On June 8, a Head Start ribbon-cutting ceremony celebrated the opening of a brand-new space for the program. 

Modern science is immensely complex, but Professor Virginia Cornish had a simple idea for solving a big problem. The problem was cholera, which infects about four million people annually and kills at least 100,000, most of them children under age 5.